You are not logged in | | Sign Up

Related: ‘The American’s Unpatriotically Underwhelming Box Office Performance, Internet Radio Station Dubset Comes to the iPhone, ‘Office’ Rumors: Keitel to Get Promotion?, Links: T.I. Arrested Again, Paris Hilton Banned From Rival Hotels, Tony Blair & Five Other Politicians Who Know How to Write

Comments   (22)

Posted by anonymous on Fri Dec 25, 2009 at 09.19 pm

#1
What about Nancy Sinatra? I canceled my subscription after that. Hef, that was really a low blow.....

Posted by Mike on Fri Dec 25, 2009 at 09.26 pm

#2
You completely missed the 60 (yes, that is sixty) years old Patricia Paay, who appeared buttnaked in the Dutch edition of Playboy last month...the second time she appeared. It raised some eyebrowes over here, needless to say.

Posted by sarah smitih on Fri Dec 25, 2009 at 09.51 pm

#3
those aren't the worst pictures i've seen, but they are pretty bad. you wonder what they were thinking when they made most of these covers

Posted by anonymous on Fri Dec 25, 2009 at 10.11 pm

#4
Weren't most of those 2009? Probably more then half were recent. Yea, Playboys survival is looking bleak, and with the taste of their current editorial staff it can't last much longer. Maxium with tits isn't what I have been buying the last 40 years.

Posted by anonymous on Fri Dec 25, 2009 at 10.42 pm

#5
If these really are the worst PB covergirls, maybe I should subscribe. Most of these females I find quite attractive. Okay, maybe many aren't obvious porn material, but some are downright hot! The only one whose image actually disgusts me is Paris. She has cultivated the slut image so successfully, that I can't even look at her.

Posted by anonymous on Fri Dec 25, 2009 at 10.57 pm

#6
forgot the walmart edition

Posted by Medisoft on Fri Dec 25, 2009 at 11.16 pm

#7
They're not all that bad.

Posted by anonymous on Sat Dec 26, 2009 at 04.06 am

#8
Except for Alba, for reasons you point out, every one of those covers really stinks.

Posted by anonymous on Sat Dec 26, 2009 at 12.39 pm

#9
and the carmel? where is the carmel?

Posted by anonymous on Sat Dec 26, 2009 at 11.29 pm

#10
LaToya's issue came out in 1989 and the allegations came out in 1993. What does that have to do with how terrible the cover was? Please learn to make your articles more relevant. Also, I don't see anything wrong with these covers besides either the covergirl not being in the nude or there's too many words covering the girls up. This is Playboy, not the National Enquirer. There's no need for that humongous text. Anyone blind is not going to be able to see the cover anyways.

View All Comments...

Post a Comment

Anonymous comments are moderated. To comment instantly, register with BlackBook.

Notify me of follow-up comments?

City: New York
  • image bobo
    181 W. 10th St.
    $5 wine and local beer / $1 local oysters…
  • image alice + olivia
    80 W. 40th St.
    15% off all full-priced items. Enter…
  • image Edward's
    136 W. Broadway
    Half-priced wine on Wednesdays.
  • image Café Loup
    105 W. 13th St.
    $28 prix-fixe dinner.
  • image Intermix
    125 Fifth Ave.
    Receive 15% off all full-priced items.…
  • Il Bastardo Il Bastardo
    191 Seventh Ave.
    Tuscan steakhouse draws energetic, young…
  • Alloro Alloro
    307 E. 77th St.
    Cacio e Pepe peeps get creative on the…
  • 10 Downing 10 Downing
    10 Downing St.
    Reservations: 8:30, 9:00 Stephane and…
  • Friend of a Farmer Friend of a Farmer
    77 Irving Pl.
    Screw Hudson, this place is way more…
  • Café Luxembourg Café Luxembourg
    200 W. 70th St.
    Pre-Balthazar classic bistro still riding…