You are not logged in | | Sign Up

Related: Industry Insiders: Christopher Gilman, Latin Lover, Good Units Opens Tonight, An Interview with Novelist Adam Haslett, Inside the Mind of a ‘Fast and Furious’ Fan, Dear Uncle Steve: Relationship Advice from Steve Lewis & a Girl

Comments   (21)

Posted by Fernando Cwilich Gil on Tue Aug 25, 2009 at 04.12 pm

sounds like a great dude!

Posted by kino on Tue Aug 25, 2009 at 05.47 pm

this dude got attitude! his ‘daring’ food sounds very el bulli anyway. but easier to get a table at his.

Posted by FoodieInsider on Wed Aug 26, 2009 at 06.03 pm

Why did he ask a question to a question? This interview just seemed silly

Posted by anonymous552 on Wed Aug 26, 2009 at 09.38 pm

Your questions sucked.  They were insulting to Mr. Liebrandt’s intelligence.  Most “celebrities” would have tried to answer your questions, stomaching the absurd nature of those questions.  Mr. Liebrandt made no such effort.  I admire him for being honest, at some personal risk.

Posted by STEVE on Thu Aug 27, 2009 at 01.20 am

nice questions there. you people are complete idiots. liebrandt = winner

Posted by Fernando Cwilich Gil on Thu Aug 27, 2009 at 07.39 am

that’s a lot of attitude for a cook

Posted by Foster Kamer on Thu Aug 27, 2009 at 09.30 am

STEVE/Paul:

Thanks for stopping by. One question - about what he feels is the most daring thing on his menu - is one of many that’s maybe superficially uninteresting. If Paul chose to answer it, though, it might’ve challenged him past more than just being a dick, which is a default route. He would’ve had to give a personal answer, one that most interviewers don’t have the balls to ask. The guy clearly fancies himself more of an artist than a craftsman. Fine, but this is the type of bullshit, highbrow posturing that needs to stop annoying the New York dining scene. We’re clearly not pedestrian, but we’re not going to take any bullshit, either. He had the chance to dignify us with some answers, and instead of choosing a route that was at the very least courteous, he was an asshole in the great tradition of assholes. So it is. And we ran it.

Posted by sam on Thu Aug 27, 2009 at 09.58 am

your questions were infantile. if you think he’s an asshole, why would you post the ‘interview?’ i should’ve sympathized with you but im actually on the side of paul here.

Posted by Foster Kamer on Thu Aug 27, 2009 at 10.14 am

Are we supposed to not post the interview because there aren’t any substantial answers? I think it speaks volumes about him. We got far more than we bargained for; a win-win situation, I’d say.

Posted by anonymous552 on Thu Aug 27, 2009 at 10.26 am

You have as high an opinion of yourself as you claim Mr. Liebrandt has.  Perhaps other chefs have pre-packaged answers to absurd questions, making you smug in your assertion that Liebrandt should have been more cooperative with your interviewer.  Your liberal use of vulgarities in your defense of this interview cheapens you even more.  Sorry to be so old-fashioned, but, as I tell my kids, if you can’t express yourself without vulgarity, maybe you shouldn’t express yourself at all.

View All Comments...

Post a Comment

Anonymous comments are moderated. To comment instantly, register with BlackBook.

Notify me of follow-up comments?

  • New High (M)art New High (M)art
    1720 N. Vermont Ave.
    Since moving from Chinatown, this concept…
  • Han Cholo Han Cholo
    1549 Eco Park Ave.
    Want to make a statement? Snag the dagger…
  • Necromance Necromance
    7220 Melrose Ave.
    Vintage taxidermy, animal bones, and…
  • EM and Co. EM and Co.
    7940 3rd St.
    Unique and often one-of-a-kind jewelry…
  • EM and Co. EM and Co.
    7940 3rd St.
    Unique and often one-of-a-kind jewelry…