Sarah Palin 2012: Do Not Want
November 06, 2008
Not all of us can resist. Sarah Palin in 2012? No thanks! Please let this latest news tuck that Wasilla whack job away forever. As if her sheer Palinocity wasn't weird and wrong enough, now it turns out she was even nuttier than previously thought. Forget about the $150,000 the RNC coughed up for her shopping spree. According to Newsweek, that figure was grossly underestimated.
Sources say the RNC agreed to pay Palin for three suits, a stylist, and a suit for her goateed husband. Turns out she went on a shopping frenzy and, according to MSNBC reports, spent $30,000 to $40,000 on her husband plus $20,000 to $30,000 on her kids (including Gucci shoes)—not to mention 13 suitcases to haul it all. One McCain senior adviser described it as “Wasilla Hillbillies looting Neiman Marcus coast to coast.” The source also said that during the campaign, Palin was difficult, brash, and only spoke with McCain once a week. By comparison, that lipsticked pig is starting to look pretty attractive.
See also: Sarah Palin: Gay Icon
Comments (13)
Posted by Wes Boudville on Thu Nov 6, 2008 at 06.21 pm
Sarah Palin makes George W Bush look like an intellectual. Seriously.
In an alternate universe, McCain won, and Palin is now Veep-elect. Imagine how you’d feel if these stories about her emerged.
Posted by Jonathan on Thu Nov 6, 2008 at 07.06 pm
When she couldn’t name any news sources that she reads, others were shocked, saying that she must be uninformed. I was shocked that she was caught flat-footed and couldn’t even lie about something so basic. If a politician is so flimsy that she can’t even deflect such a basic question, how can she deal with the big leagues of politics?
Posted by Joe on Thu Nov 6, 2008 at 11.57 pm
Well, according to Palin’s aide (who is trying to refute all of this), she actually has a “photographic memory.” I guess it doesn’t apply to magazines, though? Because they later claimed that she reads the Economist.
Of course, the same aide unintentionally confirmed several other facts in the story, like the fact that a wealthy donor was asked to pay for all of those expenses. So she’s even bad at lying, it would appear.
Posted by whatever on Fri Nov 7, 2008 at 08.22 am
This isn’t a story. I was confused by the headline and then the line hinting at a new story that will ‘put her away’—followed by the same old shopping story with different dollar amounts? Stop wasting my time. The election is over. Cease the petty BS and find something intelligent to write about. I don’t want to see her in DC, ever, but it’s time to leave her alone.
Posted by steve on Fri Nov 7, 2008 at 09.05 am
What a vile person she really turned out to be. I was nauseated the first time I saw her when she spoke at the RNC.
And it just jept on getting worse. Let’s hope she simply fades away.
She showed the worst side of humanity.
Posted by Donald J. Miller on Fri Nov 7, 2008 at 09.18 am
What is your problem?
Question what did Obmama pay for his suites smarty?
How about Hilary or any one out compaigning?
Have you ask the question?
If you have not shut the hell up!
How can you say something bad when you don’t compare!!!!
All comments in the press should compare the opposite side show all the true facts, then make what every editoral you want. It just to easy to bash, to lazy to get it right.
I wonder sometime how some journalist actually graduated from college.
Posted by J.W. on Fri Nov 7, 2008 at 09.42 am
Ah, the little verbal assassins are busily sniping away in their dark little rooms with the three V’s of the internet snipe. Villify. Vitriol. Venom.
Yet Sarah Palin remains the youthful and popular
governor of Alaska. She’s a success in the real world
And just what have you verbal assassins accomplished in your little lives in the real world?
Posted by Laurie on Sun Nov 9, 2008 at 10.37 am
I am glad that Sarah Palin dries all you leftist whackos crazy. She is so much smarter than all of you put together. Sarah 2012!!!!!
Posted by Cathy Woolley on Tue Nov 11, 2008 at 02.49 pm
Take my name of this leftist website. I can not believe you are actually printed and reporting mis-truths of Sarah Palin. The one you should be afraid of is Michelle Obama and how she will influence her husband!!
Post a Comment
Anonymous comments are moderated. To comment instantly, register with BlackBook. Click here to login.
Posted by JadeBlue on Thu Nov 6, 2008 at 10.23 am
Thank goodness that the American public understood that Sarah Palin was not ready for prime time. Even women I know who are usually Republicans found her unappealing and not very smart. People I knew who were liberal feminists had a harder time criticizing her—maybe because they were too desperate for a woman, any woman, to run.
Isn’t also ironic that just as Nieman Marcus and Saks are posting losses for the last month as not even rich people wanted to shop, the stores are also getting publicity as places Palin shopped during Octber? Is that good publicity?